Avoiding Mistakes in Understanding the Hadith of Prophet Muhammad SAW with Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī's Hermeneutics

Authors

  • Kamarudin Kamarudin Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokrama Palu, Indonesia
  • Suprijati Sarib Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Manado, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9656-5414
  • Juhrah M. Arib Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Manado, Indonesia
  • Sudarmadi Putra Sekolah Tinggi Islam Al-Mukmin (STIM) Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Rahman Rahman Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v7i1.5874

Keywords:

hadīth understanding, hermeneutics, methodology, Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the methodology for understanding hadÄ«th according to YÅ«suf Qaraá¸ÄwÄ«. This study uses library research methods to analyze data. The primary data are Qaraá¸ÄwÄ«'s work, while the secondary data are books and journal articles relevant to the topic of this study. The results of this study indicate that Qaraá¸ÄwÄ« offers eight steps to understanding hadÄ«th, namely defining hadÄ«th based on the Qur'Än, collecting hadÄ«th thematically, compromising contradictory hadÄ«ths, identifying asbÄb al-wurÅ«d of the hadÄ«th, distinguishing changing and unchanging means, differentiating between the literal and figurative language (majÄz), recognizing the unseen and the real, and confirming the meaning of the words in the hadÄ«th. Some points that must be avoided in interacting with á¹£unnÄh are the interpretation of the ignorant, the deviation of the extremes, and the manipulation of the heretics. Furthermore, the basic principles in interacting with á¹£unnÄh are examining the validity of hadÄ«th based on the scientific principles established by hadÄ«th experts, understanding the editorial hadÄ«th properly according to the language instructions and the context of the hadÄ«th, and ensuring that the matÄn of the hadÄ«th does not conflict with the nÄsh of the Qur'an or other hadÄ«th with a more powerful position

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Suprijati Sarib, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Manado

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=id&user=Nx-12rEAAAAJ

Sudarmadi Putra, Sekolah Tinggi Islam Al-Mukmin (STIM) Surakarta

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=mX5RtYgAAAAJ&hl=id&oi=ao

References

Abdul, Abu Hassan, and Wahibah Twahir. “The Disciplinary Issues in Malay Figurative Language and Its Similarities with Majaz Concept of the Arabic Rhetoric.†European Journal of Language and Literature 4, no. 1 (April 30, 2016): 47. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejls.v4i1.p47-55.

Abu-Alabbas, Belal. “The Principles of HadÄ«th Criticism in the Writings of Al-ShÄfiÊ¿Ä« and Muslim.†Islamic Law and Society 24, no. 4 (October 3, 2017): 311–35. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00244P01.

Ainurrofiq, Faiq. “The Use of Hermeneutics Double Movement FazlÅ«r RaḥmÄn in Comprehending HadÄ«th of the Unsuccessful Leadership of Women.†Jurnal Ushuluddin 27, no. 2 (December 31, 2019): 132–44. https://doi.org/10.24014/JUSH.V27I2.6719.

Al-‘AsqalÄnÄ«, Ibn Hajar. Fath Al-BÄrÄ« Syarh ShahÄ«h Al-BukhÄrÄ«. Kairo: DÄr al-Bayan al-‘Arabi, 2007.

Al-BukhÄrÄ«, Muḥammad ibn IsmÄ‘īl. Al-JÄmi’ Al-Musnad Ash-ShahÄ«h Al-Mukhtashar Min UmÅ«r RasÅ«lillÄh ShallÄllÄhu ‘Alaihi Wa Sallama Wa Sunanihi Wa AyyÄmihi. Mesir: DÄr Thoqu An-Najah, 1422.

Al-Hajjaj, AbÅ« Husein Muslim bin. ShahÄ«h Al-MÅ«slÄ«m. BeÄ«rÅ«t: DÄr al-FÄ«kr, 2011.

Al-Khaá¹­ib, Muhammad ‘AjjÄj. Uá¹£hÅ«l Al-ḤadÄ«th: ‘UlÅ«muhÅ« Wa Muá¹£há¹­alÄḥūh. BeÄ«rÅ«t: DÄr al-FÄ«kr, 2006.

Alshehri, Mohammed Salem. “Western Works and Views On Hadith: Beginnings, Nature, and Impact.†Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 46, no. 46 (January 6, 2015): 203–24. https://doi.org/10.15370/muifd.41804.

Amir, Hamzah, Achyar Nasution, and Ardiansyah Zein. “Kontribusi Pemikiran YÅ«suf Qaraá¸ÄwÄ« Dalam KitÄb Kaifa Nata’Ämal Ma’a Al-á¹¢unnÄh Al-NabÄwiyyÄh.†AT-TAHDIS: Journal of Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (March 31, 2017): 141–57. http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/attahdits/article/view/651.

Arib, Juhrah M., Nikmatul Khairiyah, M. Suryadinata, and Sabil Mokodenseho. “The Inheritance of Human Traits in the Qur’an Based on the Scientific Interpretation of ZaghlÅ«l RÄghib Muḥammad an-NajjÄr.†AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 6, no. 2 (September 17, 2022): 863–86. https://doi.org/10.29240/ALQUDS.V6I2.4199.

Awad, Khaled M., Mustafa El-Nainay, Mohammad Abdeen, Marwan Torki, Omar Saif, and Emad Nabil. “A Secure Blockchain Framework for Storing Historical Text: A Case Study of the Holy Hadith.†Computers 11, no. 42 (March 14, 2022): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11030042.

Boullata, Issa J. “Studies in the Majiiz and Metaphorical Language of the Qur’an: Abu ’Ubayda and Al-Sharif Al-Racli.†In Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Qu’ran, 317–60. Routledge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203037041-24.

Caeiro, Alexandre, and Mahmoud Al-Saify. “Qaraá¸ÄwÄ« in Europe, Europe in QaradÄwÄ«.†In Global Mufti, The Phenomenon of YÅ«suf Al-Qaraá¸ÄwÄ«, edited by Bettina Gräf and Jakob Skovgaard-Petersen. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.

El-Wereny, Mahmud. “TajdÄ«d Ad-DÄ«n: Islam and the Question of Renewal in the Thought of YÅ«suf Al-Qaraá¸ÄwÄ«.†International Journal of Philosophy and Theology (IJPT) 5, no. 2 (2017): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijpt.v5n2a3.

Gräf, Bettina. “Sheikh YÅ«suf Al-Qaraá¸ÄwÄ« in Cyberspace.†Die Welt Des Islams 47, no. 3 (2007): 403–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006007783237464.

Hamisan@khair, Nur Saadah, and Nurdina Mohd Dahlan. “The Debate on Anti-Woman Discourse in the Hadīth Literature.†Journal Of Hadith Studies 2, no. 1 (June 15, 2017): 2550–1448. https://doi.org/10.33102/JOHS.V2I1.9.

Handika, Caca. “Pemahaman HadÄ«th YÅ«suf Qaraá¸ÄwÄ« Dalam Menentukan Hukum Islam.†Al-Mawarid 1, no. 2 (August 20, 2019): 164–78. https://doi.org/10.20885/MAWARID.VOL1.ISS2.ART4.

Haq, Sansan Ziaul, and Asep Salahudin. “Moderasi ‘Di Atas’ Tekstualisme-Kontekstualisme: Metodologi Pemahaman á¹¢unnÄh YÅ«suf Al-Qaraá¸ÄwÄ«.†AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 6, no. 3 (October 1, 2022): 965–86. https://doi.org/10.29240/ALQUDS.V6I3.4057.

Harb, Lara. “Arabic Literary Theory.†In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.989.

Hassan, Said Fares. “YÅ«suf Al-Qaraá¸ÄwÄ«: An Ideologue for Muslim Minorities.†In Fiqh Al-AqalliyyÄt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137350091_4.

ImÄrah, Muhammad. Al-DuktÅ«r YÅ«suf Al-Qaraá¸Äwi Madrasah Fikriyyah Wa Al-MashrÅ« Al-Fikri. Kairo: DÄr al-SalÄm, 2004.

———. Al-Syeikh Muhammad Al-GazÄli Al-Mauqi’ Al-Fikri Wa Al-Ma’Ärik Al-Fikriyah. Kairo: al-Haiah al-Mishriyyah al-‘Ammah li al-KitÄb, 1992.

Isma’il, H. M. Syuhudi. Hadīth Nabi Yang Tekstual Dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1994.

Izza, Farah Nuril. “Hermeneutika: Arah Baru Interpretasi HadÄ«th (Studi Analisis Pemikiran YÅ«suf Al-Qaraá¸ÄwÄ« Dalam Fatwa-Fatwanya).†Komunika 8, no. 2 (January 1, 2014): 192–220. https://doi.org/10.24090/KOMUNIKA.V8I2.756.

Kamarudin, Kamarudin, and Sabil Mokodenseho. “A Debate on the Islamic Practice of Pilgrimage to the Grave: Study of the Hadīth on Grave Pilgrimage for Women.†AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 6, no. 2 (August 9, 2022): 495–510. https://doi.org/10.29240/ALQUDS.V6I2.4390.

Kementerian Agama RI. Al-Qur’Än Dan Terjemah. Surabaya: Lentera Optima Pustaka, 2011.

Khoiri, M. Alim. “Interaksi Dan Pemahaman HadÄ«th: Telaah Hermeneutis Pemikiran YÅ«suf Al-Qaraá¸ÄwÄ«,.†Universum: Jurnal Keislaman Dan Kebudayaan 12, no. 1 (January 31, 2019): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.30762/universum.v12i1.1059.

Krämer, Gudrun. Makers of the Muslim World: HasÄn Al-BannÄ. London: Oneworld Publications, 2010.

Miski, Miski. “False Hadith, Identity, and Contestation of Thought: The Analysis of Hadith on the Division of Muhammad’s Ummah in the Historical Dimension.†Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 25, no. 1 (July 1, 2021): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.29300/MADANIA.V25I1.4246.

Mohamed, Emad, and Raheem Sarwar. “Linguistic Features Evaluation for Hadīth Authenticity through Automatic Machine Learning.†Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 37, no. 3 (August 23, 2022): 830–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/LLC/FQAB092.

Mukhibat, M. “The Teaching Management and Study of Hadith: Method, Contents, and Approaches.†Utopia y Praxis Latioamericana, no. 24 (2019): 153–62.

MÅ«slÄ«m, ImÄm. ShahÄ«h MÅ«slÄ«m. IV. Mesir: IsÄ al-BÄbÄ« al-HalabÄ«, n.d.

Muthalib, Abdul Razak Abd, and Basri Ibrahim. “Methods for Understanding of Prophet’s Hadis: Application Towards Hadis of Jihad.†International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 10, no. 4 (April 12, 2020): 380–95. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i4/7141.

Patel, Youshaa. “‘Whoever Imitates a People Becomes One of Them’: A Hadīth and Its Interpreters.†Islamic Law and Society 25, no. 4 (October 19, 2018): 359–426. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00254A01.

Qaraá¸ÄwÄ«, YÅ«suf. Al-‘Aql Wa Al-‘Ilm FÄ« Al-QurÄn Al-KarÄ«m. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1996.

———. Al-HalÄl Wa Al-HarÄm Fi Al-IslÄm. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1993.

———. Al-ĪmÄn Wa Al-HayÄt. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1996.

———. BuyÅ« Al-MurÄbaḥah Li Al-‘Āmir Bi Al-Shira’ Kama Tajrīḥī Al-Maá¹£Ärif Al-IslÄmiyyah. BeÄ«rÅ«t: Maktabah Wahbah, 1987.

———. Dawr Al-Qiyam Wa Al-AkhlÄq FÄ« Al-Iqtiá¹£Äd Al-IslÄmÄ«. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1995.

———. Dawr Al-ZakÄh FÄ« ‘IlÄj Al-MusykilÄt Al-IqtisÄdiyyah Wa SyurÅ«th NajÄhihÄ. Kairo: DÄr al-SyurÅ«q, 2001.

———. Fī Fiqh Al-Awlawīyāt: Dirāsah Jadīdah Fī Ḍawʼ Al-Qurʼān Wa-Al-Sunnah. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1995.

———. Fiqhu Al-á¹¢iyÄm. Kairo: DÄr ash-Shuhut, 1991.

———. Hady Al-IslaÌ„m, FataÌ„waÌ MuÊ»aÌ„sÌ£irah. Kairo: DaÌ„r AÌ„faÌ„q al-Ghad, 1981.

———. Ibn Al-Qarya Wa-l-KuttÄb: Malamih Sira Wa-Masira. I. Kairo: DÄr al-SyurÅ«q, 2004.

———. Ibn Al-Qarya Wa-l-KuttÄb: Malamih Sira Wa-Masira. III. Kairo: DÄr al-SyurÅ«q, 2006.

———. Kaifa Nata’Ämal Ma’a Al- á¹¢unnÄh Al-NabÄwiyyÄh. Kairo: DÄr al-SyurÅ«q, 2002.

———. Kaifa Nata’Ämal Ma’a Al- á¹¢unnÄh Al-NabÄwiyyÄh. 2nd ed. Kairo: DÄr al-SyurÅ«q, 2005.

———. Kenanganku Bersama Ikhwanul Muslimin, Terj., M. Lili Nur Aulia. Jakarta: Aulia Publisher, 2003.

———. Madkhal Li DirÄsah Al-Sharīᶜah Al-IslÄmiyah. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2001.

———. Madkhal Li Ma’rifati Al-IslÄm MuqawwimÄtuhÅ«: Khaá¹£ÄisuhÅ«, AhdÄfuhu, Maá¹£ÄdiruhÅ«. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1996.

———. Mauqifu Al-IslÄm Mina Al-IlhÄm Wa Al-Kashfi, Wa Al-Ra’yi, Wa Mina Al-TamÄm Wa Al-Kahanah Wa Al-Ruqa. Mesir: Maktabah Wahbah, 2004.

———. Prioritas Gerakan Islam: Antisipasi Masa Depan Gerakan Islam, Terj., A. Najiyulloh. Jakarta: Al Ishlahy Press, 1993.

———. Sharī’atu Al-IslÄm: á¹¢Älihat Li Al-TatbÄ«q Fi Kulli ZamÄn Wa MakÄn. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1977.

Rahman, Rosfazila Abd, Abdul Razif Zaini, and Abur Hamdi Usman. “Hadith, Common Historical Method in Islam and Meta Theory in Sociology: Transcending the Islamic Heritage.†In The Reality of Urban Heritage Sites in the Arab World Approaches and Experiences, 316–28. Berlin: The Arab Democratic Center Berlin, 2021.

Rohmansyah, Rohmansyah. “Elasticity of Understanding of M. Syuhudi Ismail on Hadith About the Threats for Painter.†ADDIN 13, no. 2 (August 1, 2019): 271–94. https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v13i2.6263.

Saloot, Mohammad Arshi, Norisma Idris, Rohana Mahmud, Salinah Ja’afar, Dirk Thorleuchter, and Abdullah Gani. “Hadīth Data Mining and Classification: A Comparative Analysis.†Artificial Intelligence Review 46, no. 1 (June 1, 2016): 113–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10462-016-9458-X/METRICS.

Skovgaard-Petersen, Jakob. “YÅ«suf Al-Qaraá¸ÄwÄ« and Al-Azhar.†In Global Mufti, edited by Bettina Gräf and Jakob Skovgaard-Petersen, 27–54. London, New York: Hirst & Columbia University Press, 2009.

Syarkun, Mif Rohim N. “The Influence of Prophet Muhammad’s Thought on Ijtihad.†Sains Humanika 8, no. 3–2 (August 16, 2016): 117–123. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v8n3-2.973.

Tajuddin, Tabrani, and Neny Muthiatul Awwaliyyah. “Hermeneutika YÅ«suf Qaraá¸ÄwÄ« Dalam Kitab Kaifa Nata’Ämal Al- á¹¢unnÄh Al-NabÄwiyyÄh Ma’alim Wa Dawabit.†Al-Mutsla 3, no. 1 (June 30, 2021): 29–43. https://doi.org/10.46870/JSTAIN.V3I1.47.

Tujang, Bisri. “Hermeneutika HadÄ«th YÅ«suf Qaraá¸ÄwÄ« (Studi Analisa Terhadap Metodologi Interpretasi Qaraá¸ÄwÄ«).†Al-Majaalis 2, no. 1 (November 20, 2014): 33–68. https://doi.org/10.37397/ALMAJAALIS.V2I1.21.

Usman, Abur Hamdi, Nazneen Ismail, Zainora Daud, and Rosni Wazir. “Interaction with Prophetic Tradition: A Review of Al-Qaraá¸Äwī’s Thought.†Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 7, no. 1 (2016): 547–54. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n1p547.

Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. “MaghÄzÄ« and the MuḥaddithÅ«n : Reconsidering the Treatment of ‘Historical’ Materials in Early Collections of Hadith.†International Journal of Middle East Studies 28, no. 1 (February 23, 1996): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743800062759.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-09

How to Cite

Kamarudin, K., Sarib, S., M. Arib, J., Putra, S., & Rahman, R. (2023). Avoiding Mistakes in Understanding the Hadith of Prophet Muhammad SAW with YÅ«suf QaraḍāwÄ«’s Hermeneutics. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 7(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v7i1.5874

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).