Legal Institutions in Resolving Divorce Cases in Aceh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i1.8529Keywords:
Custom, village customary institution, state, divorceAbstract
This study aims to examine the legal institutions involved in divorce settlement in Langsa City. Apart from that, this study also analyzes the influence of each institution on the solution to the divorce problem in Aceh. Empirical legal studies are carried out using social and legislative frameworks. A statute approach is used to examine the legal elements in the process of resolving divorce cases, while a sociological approach is used to examine the social components of divorce practice. This study found that the Gampong traditional institution has more influence than the Sharia Court in resolving divorce cases. Even though state law does not allow divorce outside of court, the community believes that the Gampong traditional institution can resolve divorce cases more quickly, cheaply, easily, and with ease. more sacred. This differs from divorce in religious courts, which usually takes time, and filing takes time. Divorce through religious courts is used by the community when the parties want to legalize their new marriage. This study concludes that the influence of traditional institutions is very strong for the people of Langsa City because traditional institutions are able to resolve divorce problems easily and quickly. This study contributes to a distinct viewpoint on divorce by demonstrating that, in addition to state institutions, traditional institutions play an essential role in resolving divorce cases. Without disobeying state laws, the government need to respect traditional institutions' rulings in divorce situations. This implies that a conventional institution's decision may serve as a basis for the law in divorce situations. Aside from that, a court divorce still carries a bad reputation in society because of the length, difficulty of the procedure, and perceived difficulty of the operations.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, N. “A Critical Appraisal of ‘Triple Divorce’ in Islamic Law.†International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 23, no. 1 (January 29, 2009): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebn019.
Ainiyah, Qurrotul, and Imam Muslih. “Dilema Hukum Keluarga Di Indonesia (Studi Analisis Kasus Perceraian Di Indonesia).†Jurnal Istiqro 6, no. 1 (July 4, 2020): 73–81. https://doi.org/10.30739/istiqro.v6i1.560.
Alamsyah, Rahmad, Imadah Thoyyibah, and Tri Novianti. “Pengaruh Teori Receptie Dalam Politik Hukum Kolonial Belanda Terhadap Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Adat Dalam Sejarah Hukum Indonesia | Alamsyah | PETITA,†January 28, 2022. https://doi.org/10.33373/pta.v3i2.3875.
Al-Asqalani, Ibn Hajar. Fathu Al-Bȃrȋ Bisyarhi Shahȋh al-Bukhȃrȋ. Jordan: Baitu al-Afkȃr al-Dauliyah, 2000.
Amato, Paul R. “The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and Children.†Journal of Marriage and Family 62, no. 4 (November 2000): 1269–1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x.
Andrea, Fahmi Tiara Rahma, and Zakiah Nurul Awaliyah. “Fulfillment of The Rights of Wife and Children Post Divorce.†MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review 1, no. 2 (December 27, 2022): 241. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v1i2.6211.
Asmara, Musda, and Reti Andira. “Urgensi Talak Di Depan Sidang Pengadilan Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah.†Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 3, no. 2 December (December 29, 2018): 207–226.
Azwir, Azwir. “Legalitas Perceraian Di Luar Pengadilan (Analisis Perceraian Pada Masyarakat Aceh).†Doctoral, Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, 2022.
Azwir, Azwir, Pagar Pagar, and Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution. “The Legality of Divorce in Aceh: A Study of Divorce Practices Out of Religious Courts.†Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, November 25, 2022, 165–80. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v16i2.6389.
Bawono, Royan. Hakim Mahkamah Syar’iyah, December 2, 2022.
Buzama, Khoiruddin. “Pemberlakuan Teori-Teori Hukum Islam di Indonesia.†Al-’Adalah 10, no. 2 (2012): 467–472. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v10i2.300.
Cammack, Mark, Lawrence A. Young, and Tim B. Heaton. “An Empirical Assessment of Divorce Law in Indonesia.†Studia Islamika 4, no. 4 (March 30, 2014). https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v4i4.766.
Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Prenada Media, 2018.
Faisal. Kepala Dusun, July 8, 2020.
Farid, Diana, Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti, Hendriana Hendriana, and Iffah Fathiah. “Interfaith Marriage: Subjectivity of the Judge in Determination of No. 454/Pdt.p/2018 Surakarta District Court.†Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 2 November (December 1, 2022): 348. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i2.4574.
Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.
Hasbi, Abu. Tuha Pheut, November 5, 2022.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “What Are Institutions?†Journal of Economic Issues 40, no. 1 (March 2006): 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879.
Hurgronje, Christian Snouck. The Achehnese. Vol. 1. Leyden: LATE E. J. BRILL, 1906.
Husin, Asna. “Falling Out of Love: Divorce of Three Acehnese Ubanan Couples in the Islamic Law Perspective.†Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 3 (November 30, 2023): 1869. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i3.19433.
Ikramatoun, Siti, and Khairul Amin. “Konstelasi Politik Aceh Pasca MoU Helsinki (2006-2015).†Jurnal Sosiologi USK (Media Pemikiran & Aplikasi) 12, no. 1 (June 17, 2018): 89–110.
Iman, Iman Fadhilah, Tedi Kholiludin, Muhammad Lutfi Hakim, and Ubbadul Adzkiya’. “Exploring the Monogamy Principle in the Samin Community’s Customary Marriages in Kudus: Harmonisation of Tradition and State Law.†Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 23, no. 2 (2023): 294. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v23i2.281-304.
Imron, Ali. “Memahami Konsep Perceraian Dalam Hukum Keluarga.†BUANA GENDER : Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak 1, no. 1 (June 28, 2016): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.22515/bg.v1i1.66.
Irwan. Wawancara dengan Masyarakat, 2023.
Izzuddin, Ahmad, Ahmad Rofiq, and Abu Hapsin. “Revitalizing Divorce Ethical Values in Verstek Decisions in Religious Courts/Revitalisasi Nilai Etika Perceraian dalam Putusan Verstek Di Pengadilan Agama.†De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar’iah 13, no. 1 (July 28, 2021): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v13i1.12191.
Jamaluddin, Nanda Amalia, and Laila M. Rasyid. “Women And Divorce: Legal Justice Study Of Societal And Judicial Perspective Toward Unrecorded Divorce in Aceh, Indonesia.†US-China Law Review 12, no. 8 (August 28, 2015): 656–57. https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6605/2015.08.002.
Jamhir, Jamhir. “Revitalisasi Hukum Adat Di Aceh.†Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial 1, no. 1 (July 8, 2020): 68–90. https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v1i1.2562.
Kamaruddin, Kamaruddin. “Model Penyelesaian Konflik di Lembaga Adat.†Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 21, no. 1 (June 15, 2013): 39–70. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.21.1.236.
Kingsbury, Damien. “The Free Aceh Movement: Islam and Democratisation.†Journal of Contemporary Asia 37, no. 2 (May 2007): 166–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701253759.
Mahbub, Roihan. Hakim Mahkamah Syar’iyyah, 2022.
Manaf, Abdul. MPU Kota Langsa, Desember 2023.
Menski, Werner. Comparative Law in a Global Context the Legal Systems of Asia and Africa. London: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Muhazir, Muhazir. “Islam, Fatwa Dan Negara: Meretas Pluralisme Hukum Perceraian Di Aceh.†Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 15, no. 2 (December 1, 2021): 233–248. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i2.5150.
Murziqin, Ramzi. “Aceh Paska MoU Helsinki.†Al-Ijtima`i: International Journal of Government and Social Science 1, no. 2 (April 30, 2016): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.22373/jai.v1i2.475.
Muzakkir. “Integrasi Hukum Adat Dalam Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 17, no. 1 (June 18, 2022): 61–69. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v17i1.5609.
Nasir, Mohamad Abdun. “Islamic Law and Paradox of Domination and Resistance.†Asian Journal of Social Science 44, no. 1–2 (2016): 78–103. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-04401006.
Nelli, Jumni, Afrizal Mansur, Zulkifli Zulkifli, Maghfirah Maghfirah, Sofia Hardani, and Izzah Nur Aida. “The Immorality of a Husband as the Cause of a Working Wife to File for Divorce Lawsuit in Indonesia.†JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 22, no. 1 (June 13, 2023): 119. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i1.7392.
North, Douglass C. “Institutions.†Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, no. 1 (February 1, 1991): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97.
Nurlaelawati, Euis. “Muslim Women in Indonesian Religious Courts.†Islamic Law and Society 20, no. 3 (2013): 242–271. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-0010A0003.
Ratnawaty, Latifah. “Perceraian di Bawah Tangan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif.†YUSTISI 4, no. 1 (March 1, 2017): 112–112. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v4i1.1126.
Rizki, Alfathur. “Kasus Perceraian di Langsa Meningkat.†AJNN.net, March 20, 2023. https://www.ajnn.net/news/kasus-perceraian-di-langsa-meningkat/index.html.
Sahlan, Muhammad. “Pengamatan Sosiologis tentang Perceraian di Aceh.†Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 14, no. 1 (April 11, 2012): 88–97. https://doi.org/10.22373/substantia.v14i1.4858.
Salahuddin. Ketua MPU Kota Langsa, July 2020.
Salim, Arskal. “Adat and Islamic Law in Contemporary Aceh, Indonesia: Unequal Coexistence and Asymmetric Contestation.†Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (December 25, 2021): 529–51. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.11082.
———. “Adat and Islamic Law in Contemporary Aceh, Indonesia: Unequal Coexistence and Asymmetric Contestation.†Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (December 25, 2021): 529–51. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.11082.
———. “Dynamic Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Contested Legal Orders in Contemporary Aceh.†The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 42, no. 61 (January 2010): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2010.10756640.
Siddiki, Saba, Tanya Heikkila, Christopher M. Weible, Raul Pachecoâ€Vega, David Carter, Cali Curley, Aaron Deslatte, and Abby Bennett. “Institutional Analysis with the Institutional Grammar.†Policy Studies Journal 50, no. 2 (May 2022): 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12361.
Sulaiman. Wawancara Imam Gampong PB. Seuleumah, 2020.
Toni, Agus. “Aktualisasi Hukum Perceraian Perspektif Pengadilan Agama Di Indonesia.†MAQASHID Jurnal Hukum Islam 1, no. 2 (September 21, 2018): 34–63. https://doi.org/10.35897/maqashid.v1i2.130.
Wijayati, Mufliha, Irwan Abdullah, Sally White, Aden Rosadi, Ade Yamin, and Yuniar Galuh Larasati. “Justice Brokers: Women’s Experiences with Injustice and Dependence in the Divorce Process.†Edited by Kevin Cheng. Cogent Social Sciences 7, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 1966208. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1966208.
Wijayati, Mufliha, and Aden Rosadi. “Women Before The Law: Between Justice and Certainty: Notes on Divorce Settlement Case Due to Domestic Violence in Metro Religious Court.†Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 25, no. 1 (June 17, 2020): 209–234. https://doi.org/10.32332/akademika.v25i1.1974.
Zainuddin, Muslim, Mansari Mansari, and Nadhilah Filzah. “Divorce Problems and Community Social Capital in Realizing Family Resilience in Aceh.†Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (December 31, 2022): 914–33. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.15080.
———. “Divorce Problems and Community Social Capital in Realizing Family Resilience in Aceh.†Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (December 31, 2022): 914–933. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.15080.
Zubir, Zubir, and Kamaruzzaman Bustamam Ahmad. “The Dialectics of Islam and Custom in the Kenduri La’Åt Tradition of the Coastal Muslim Community of East Aceh.†Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 10, no. 3 (September 30, 2022): 899–922. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i3.778.
Zulfi Diane Zaini. “Implementasi Pendekatan Yuridis Normatif Dan Pendekatan Normatif Sosiologis Dalam Penelitian Ilmu Hukum.†Pranata Hukum 6, no. 2 (July 31, 2011): 117–119.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg)
