Between Flogging and Imprisonment: The Disparity Effect of the Sharia Court's Decision on the Supremacy of the Qanun Jinayat of Aceh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i2.8397Keywords:
Disparity, flogging, hudud, imprisonment, jinayatAbstract
This research aims to map the same cases with different sentencing decisions, determine the causes for the disparities in penalties in those decisions, and elaborate on the reasons for judges in making decisions. Qanun Jinayat of Aceh has designated flogging as the primary punishment for qanun violators. Nonetheless, many Sharia Court judges sentence offenders of sexual crimes to prison. This is empirical legal research with a normative juridical approach and a Sharia approach. Data were collected through interviews and the examination of decision documents. Those data were analyzed using data reduction, data display, and data verification. This research found that the same cases with different decisions include cases of rape, sexual harassment, and accusations of adultery. More prison sentences are imposed by Sharia Court judges in these cases than flogging and fines. The fundamental reason for these differences in decisions is due to the qanun's punishment choices, which are tinted by judges' perspectives in assessing Sharia-based qanun rules. Another factor for this disparity is the community's insistence that cases of rape and sexual harassment be punished by imprisonment or the authority to be remanded to the District Court. Some people argue that flogging has not deterred the perpetrators because, if the judge decides on this sentence, it may be carried out in a short time. Then, the perpetrator immediately returns to society and has an opportunity to repeat his crimes, while the victim is still in a traumatized state.
Downloads
References
Abas, Syahrizal, and Rusjdi Ali Muhammad. Landasan Filosofis Pelaksanaan Syariat Islam Di Aceh. Banda Aceh: Dinas Syariat Islam Provinsi Aceh, 2018.
Abubakar, Al Yasa`. Sekilas Syariat Islam Di Aceh. Banda Aceh: Dinas Syariat Islam, 2007.
Akbar, Muhammad Fatahillah. “Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 51, no. 2 (April 28, 2022): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.199-208.
Al Faraby, Muhammad Faisal. “Creativity of Protection of Rape Victims in Victimological Perspective.” Journal of Creativity Student 4, no. 2 (July 30, 2019): 143–56. https://doi.org/10.15294/jcs.v4i2.36046.
Amirulkamar, Said, Iskandar Iskandar, Fatimah Zuhrah, and M. Anzaikhan. “Administration Reagent of Aceh Family Law Qanun: Siri Marriage Motives Towards the Legality of Polygyny.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 15, no. 1 (July 23, 2023): 129–43. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v15i1.21352.
Amri, M. Saeful, and Tali Tulab. “Tauhid: Prinsip Keluarga Dalam Islam (Problem Keluarga Di Barat).” Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam 1, no. 2 (May 5, 2018): 95. https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v1i2.2444.
Anggraeny, Kurnia Dewi. “Disparitas Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Psikotropika di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 7, no. 2 (August 1, 2016): 225. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v7i2.a5469.
Anggraini, Trinita, and Erine Nur Maulidya. “Dampak Paparan Pornografi Pada Anak Usia Dini.” Al-Athfaal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 3, no. 1 (June 27, 2020): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajipaud.v3i1.6546.
Bakhtiar, Muslim. Judge (with special authority to handle jinayat cases) of the Syar’iyah Court in Banda Aceh, 2022. Banda Aceh.
Balai Syura. LSM Pemerhati Qanun, September 24, 2022.
Dinas Syariat Islam. Himpunan Undang-Undang, Keputusan Presiden, Keputusan Mahkamah Agung, Peraturan Daerah/Qanun, Peraturan Gubernur, Instruksi Gubernur. Banda Aceh: DSI, 2021.
Fajriyyah, Latifatul, and Alfitri Alfitri. “Hearsay Evidence Admissibility: Due Process and Evidentiary Rules in Muslim Marriage Legalization (Isbat Nikah).” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 16, no. 3 (October 4, 2022): 269–96. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2464.
Febriandi, Yogi, Muhammad Ansor, and Nursiti Nursiti. “Seeking Justice Through Qanun Jinayat: The Narratives of Female Victims of Sexual Violence in Aceh, Indonesia.” QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies) 9, no. 1 (July 29, 2021): 103. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v9i1.8029.
Fuad, Zainul, Surya Darma, and Muhibbuthabry Muhibbuthabry. “Wither Qanun Jinayat ? The Legal and Social Developments of Islamic Criminal Law in Indonesia.” Cogent Social Sciences 8, no. 1 (December 31, 2022): 2053269. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2053269.
Gulo, Nimerodi. “Disparitas Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 47, no. 3 (July 30, 2018): 215. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.3.2018.215-227.
Hamzah, Andy, and Bambang Waluyo. Delik-Delik Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Peradilan (Contempt of Court). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1998.
Husna, Azharul. LSM Kontras Pemerhati Qanun, Agustus 2022.
Kamarusdiana, Kamarusdiana. “Qânûn Jinâyat Aceh dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Indonesia.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 16, no. 2 (December 11, 2016): 151–62. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v16i2.4445.
Kim, SoWoong. “Pendekatan Keadilan Melalui Silaisme Dan Standarisasi Pidana (Penyusunan Pola Pidana),” n.d.
Kleden, Kristoforus Laga. “Pendekatan Viktimologi Meminimalisir Disparitas Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus 2, no. 2 (July 14, 2019): 206. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v2i2.2611.
Langkun, Tama. S, Bahrain, Mouna Wassef, Tri Wahyu, and Asram. Studi Atas Disparitas Putusan Pemidanaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2014.
Masnun, Muhammad Ali. “Disparitas Putusan Mengenai Persamaan Pada Pokoknya Pada Merek Predator (Studi Putusan Nomor 1146 K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2020).” SASI 27, no. 4 (December 31, 2021): 463. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i4.539.
Minin, Darwinsyah. “Strategi Penanganan Trafficking di Indonesia,” no. 54 (2011).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Salma Salma, Alfi Syukri Rama, Jarudin Jarudin, Muhammad Adib bin Samsudin, Defi Rahmi Fadhilah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).