Legal Reasoning By Judges In The Decision Of The Religious Court In The DKI Jakarta Area Regarding Sharia Financing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i1.10917Keywords:
Ijtihad, Judicial Rulings, Religious Court, Sharia Economic LawAbstract
This study aims to analyze the differences in Religious Court rulings on Sharia economic cases based on judges' ijtihad in interpreting and constructing laws. The legal interpretation conducted by judges represents ijtihad in uncovering legal solutions to Sharia economic issues found in Religious Court rulings in the DKI Jakarta region from 2016 to 2022. Judges’ ijtihad in legal discovery employs various methods or approaches, resulting in differences in rulings. The conceptual approaches utilized in this study include the statute approach and the case approach. The data sources for this research comprise Religious Court decisions in the DKI Jakarta region from 2016 to 2022 concerning Sharia economic cases, including murabahah, musyarakah, mudarabah, and istisna contracts. The data analysis technique employed in this research is descriptive qualitative analysis. The findings of this study demonstrate that judges’ ijtihad in legal discovery is grounded in statutory regulations and various relevant legal sources. Judges’ legal reasoning in examining, adjudicating, and delivering rulings applies different interpretative methods or approaches, leading to variations in rulings on similar Sharia economic cases. The ijtihad or legal reasoning methods used by judges are categorized into juridical interpretation methods, including grammatical, systematic, and authentic interpretations. Additionally, teleological interpretation is the sole legal reasoning method used by judges as a contextual approach, incorporating empirical evidence based on statutory provisions.
Downloads
References
Asnawi, Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama dalam Webinar Tentang Rekonsiliasi Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah, IAIN Purwekerto, 10 Oktober 2020.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI. Diakses 15 November 2023 dari: https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html.
Susilawati, Reinpal Falefi dan Agus Purwoko, ‘Impact of COVID-19’s Pandemic on the Economy of Indonesia’, Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 3.2 (2020).
Salinan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan nomor 1957/Pdt.G/2018/PA.JS dan salinan putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan nomor 407/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JS_Putusan_akhir_PDF.
Clarisa Adelia Tanry dan Kartika Anjelina Sembiring Meliala, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Gugatan yang Tidak Dapat Diterima oleh Majelis Hakim’, Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7.3 (2022).
Yurisprudensi merupakan hukum yang dibentuk berdasarkan keputusan hakim sebelumnya. Lihat
Raymond Wacks, Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory (United Kingdom: Oxford University Press: 2017),
The Role of Case Law in Indonesian Legal System’, Jurnal Konstitusi, 16.1 (2019).
Sebastian Lewis, ‘Precedent and The Rule of Law’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41.4 (2021).
Muhammad Fuad Zain, ‘Metode Penemuan Hukum dalam Sengketa Ekonomi Syari’ah di
Pengadilan Agama Purwokerto’, Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 7.3 (2021).
Harry C Bredemier, Law as an Integrative Mechanism dalam William M. Evan (ed.), Law and Sociology (New York: The Free Press of Gloencoe).
John Merrills dan Eric de Brabandere, International Dispute Settlement, 7th Edition, (New York: Cambridge University, 2022).
Amran Suadi, Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah: Teori dan Praktik (Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2017).
Lihat Pasal 1314 KUH Perdata Tentang Perikatan-perikatan yang Dilahirkan dari Kontrak atau Perjanjian. R. Subekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, (Jakarta: PT Pradnya Paramita, 2004).
Prawitra Thalib, Faizal Kurniawan dan Mohamad Nur Kholiq, ‘The Application of Quranic Interpretation, of Sunnah and Ijtihad as the Source of Islamic Law’, Rechtidee Jurnal Hukum, 15.2 (2020).
John Burton, The Sources of Islamic Law: Islamic Theories of Abrogation, (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007).
Totok Jumantoro dan Samsul Munir Amin, Kamus Ilmu Ushul Fikih, (Jakarta: Amzah, 2005).
AbÅ« IslÄm Muá¹£tofa bin Muhammad bin SalÄmah, al-TasÄ«s fÄ« UshÅ«l Fiqh ‘alÄ á¸oi al-KitÄb wa al-Sunnah, (MuthÄba’ah al-Taujibi, 1416 H).
Al-Zarkasyi, al-Bahru al-Muhiá¹ fÄ« Uá¹£ul Fiqh, Juz 4 (Lebanon : DÄr al-Kutub al Ilmiyah , 2007).
Abdul QÄdir AbdurrahmÄn al-Sa’di, Atsaru al-DalÄlah al-Nahwiyyah fÄ« IstinbÄti al-AhkÄm min Ä€yati al-Qur’Än al-Tasyrī’iyyah (Oman: DÄr ‘UmÄr, 2000).
Vinna Sri Yuniarti, ‘Analisis Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Terhadap Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah di Perbankan Syariah’, Jurnal Perspektif, 2.2 (2018).
Adriandi Kasim, ‘The Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes in Indonesian Islamic Classic Traditions and Positive Law’, Tashannuf: Journal Economics and Business of Islam, 6.1 (2021).
Abdul Rasyid and Tiska Andita Putri, ‘The Authority of Dispute Settlement An Analysis of Constitutional Court’ s Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012’, Jurnal Yudisial, 12.2 (2019).
Hasyim Sofyan Lahilote dan Moh. Fitri Adam, ‘Eksistensi Basyarnas dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia’, Al-‘Aqdu: Journal of Islamic Economics Law, 1.2 (2021).
Amanda Tikha Santriati, ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional’, El-Wasathiya: Jurnal Studi Agama, 9.1 (2021).
Dhian Indah Astanti, B. Rini Heryanti dan Subaidah Ratna Julia, ‘Enforcement of Law Dispute of Sharia Banking’, Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani), 9.2 (2019)
Budi Abdullah, Implementasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah pada Putusan Nomor: 615/Pdt.G/2016/Pn-Mdn dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif di Indonesia dan Teori Mashlahat (Disertasi: Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan, 2021). Dari: http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/11921/1/DISERTASI%20PROMOSI%20BUDI%20ABDULLAH.pdf.
Devianty Fitri, Thohor Luth, Sihabudin dan Bambang Winarno, ‘The embodiment of Islamic personality principles in sharia economic dispute resolution in Indonesia’, International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 11. 5 (2022),
Rommy Herdiansyah, Krisnadi Nasution, Hufron dan Erny Herlin Setyorini, ‘Authority of Religiuos Coutrs to Judge Sharia Bankrupty’, Technium: Social Sciences Journal, 28 (2022).
Mutaz al-Khatib, ‘Contemporary Ijtihad, Ethics and Modernity’, Journal of Islamic Ethics, 3.1-2 (2019).
Muannif Ridwan, ‘Ijtihad In The Contemporary Age (Context of Islamic Thought in Fiqih and Maqashid al-Sharia)’, Jurnal Masohi, 1.2 (2020).
Alireza Mahdavi, Hossein Ahmari dan Mostafa Rajaei Pourazo, ‘Examining the Authority and Authority of Judges in Terms of Independence, Science and Ijtihad in Jurisprudence and Law’, Propósitos Y Representaciones, 9.1 (2021).
Susi Susanti, ‘Modifikasi Ijtihad Hakim Pengadilan Agama dan Relevansinya Terhadap Hukum Islam’, Al-Qisthu, 17.1 (2019).
Jean-Michael Landry, ‘Dialectif of Ijtihad: Reforming Family Law in Contemporary Lebanon’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 39.3 (2019).
Andi Sukmawati Assad dan Baso Hasyim, ‘Judges Decisions of Makassar, Palopo, and Masamba Religious Court over the Islamic Inheritance Law’, Al-‘Adalah, 17.2 (2020).
Agus Mahfudin, ‘Ijtihad Kontemporer Yusuf Al-Qaradawi dalam Pengembangan Hukum Islam’, Religi: Jurnal Studi Islam, 5.1 (2014).
Aishath Muneeza, dkk, ‘Application of Ta’widh and Gharamah in Islamic Banking in Malaysia’, The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 16.1 (2019).
SEMA No.3 Tahun 1978 tidak lagi berlaku bagi lembaga Peradilan. Ketua Mahkamah Agung RI telah mengeluarkan Surat Edaran baru yaitu SEMA NO. 03 Tahun 2000 Tentang Putusan Serta Merta (Uitvoerbaar Bij Vooraad) dan Provisionil.
M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019).
M. Beni Kurniawan, ‘Implementation of Electronic Trial (E-Litigation) on the Civil Cases in Indonesia Court as a Legal Renewal of Civil Procedural Law’ Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9.1 (2020).
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Badan Peradilan Agama, 2011).
Konstruksi Yuridis Penerapan Uang Paksa (Dwangsom) Sebagai Instrumen Eksekusi dalam Putusan Hakim dan Eksistensinya dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2020).
Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Ikhlas Supardin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg)
